Skipping Stone: Analysis of PennEast Claims of Cost Savings and Need

Posted November 4, 2016

Energy Experts Debunk PennEast Claims of Added Reliability, Cost Savings – Again

  • Skipping Stone concludes PennEast uses project rationales “based on largely unsubstantiated and ill-defined justifications, such as ‘increased reliability’ or ‘cost-savings.”

Related Articles

NJDEP Announces Strategic Climate Action Plan

September 21, 2023

Multiple State AGs, NJ Rate Counsel Join Environmental Groups in Challenging FERC’s Flawed Approval of Unneeded REAE Fossil Fuel Project

August 11, 2023

New Jersey Advocates Launch Clean Energy Action Now

August 1, 2023
© 2024 ReThink Energy NJ | Privacy Policy