Statement on Proposed PennEast Pipeline

Supreme Court PennEast pipeline
Posted December 10, 2020

“It is not surprising that the Solicitor General for the Trump Administration is siding with an unneeded fossil fuel project. We urge the Murphy Administration to continue their strong defense of New Jersey’s rights and preserved lands against PennEast,” said Tom Gilbert, campaign director, New Jersey Conservation Foundation and ReThink Energy NJ.

“The Solicitor General’s submission failed to give the Court any reason that it should take up PennEast’s case. It’s submission ranged from asserting an entirely circular and tenuous jurisdictional argument to claiming that the sky is falling, without being able to cite a single case supporting either argument,” said Jennifer Danis, Senior Fellow, Sabin Center for Climate Change Law.

Related Articles

NJ needs an even greater sense of urgency on clean energy

May 1, 2023

NJ households could achieve over 50% reduction on energy bills by combining electric appliances with home weatherization measures

March 1, 2022

NJBPU Report: Existing Gas Capacity in NJ Can Meet Demand

December 16, 2021
© 2023 ReThink Energy NJ | Privacy Policy